|
Written By
Emre Schveighoffer
President, National Resource Management, Inc.
Every piece of equipment in your facility eventually breaks down. Your coolers and freezers are no different. The question is not whether they will fail. The question is whether you will know before the damage is done — or after. In thirty years of installing and monitoring refrigeration controls for food processors, distributors, and storage operations across the country, I have seen both outcomes more times than I can count. The difference between them is rarely the equipment. It is the information available at the moment something starts to go wrong. Most commercial refrigeration systems communicate in only one language: temperature. When the air in your cooler gets warm enough to cross a threshold, an alarm fires. By that point, the compressor may have been struggling for hours. The coil may be iced over. The product may already be at risk. Temperature is the last thing to change. It is the least useful indicator of what is actually happening inside your refrigeration system. Here is what most operators do not know: your refrigeration equipment has been trying to tell you things that the temperature sensor cannot. The amperage your compressor draws every time it runs tells you whether it is working normally or working too hard. The number of times it starts in an hour tells you whether it is cycling properly or short cycling in a way that will destroy it within days. The temperature differential between your evaporator coil and your room air tells you whether a coil is beginning to ice over — before the room temperature moves at all. This is the difference between monitoring temperature and monitoring equipment.
One tells you the problem has arrived. The other tells you the problem is developing.
At a university dining operation we have worked with since 2008, the director put it simply after eighteen years of using our system: "Since 2008, I have not lost any food. If I have, it's because we didn't respond to the alarm in time." What he means is that the alarm arrives before the loss does — not after. For food processors specifically, there is another dimension worth considering. USDA, HACCP, and FDA regulations require documented temperature logs. Most facilities meet that requirement with an employee making rounds with a clipboard, four times a day, five days a week. That is 520 hours of labor annually — and it covers only five of every seven days. The 104 days a year that go uncovered are the days when nobody is making rounds, which are also the days when a Friday afternoon problem becomes a Monday morning discovery. Automated monitoring does not replace your team. It watches when your team cannot — at 2am, on Saturday, over a holiday weekend — and alerts the right person the moment something changes. Not when the temperature has risen to a crisis point. When the equipment first shows signs of distress. I have spent the past several months putting thirty years of these lessons into a book called Cold Truth, designed specifically to help food processors, distributors, and anyone who depends on refrigeration understand what their equipment is actually telling them and what to do about it. The question I keep coming back to is the one that started all of this work: does your cooler tell you when it is sick? It should. And the technology to make that happen has never been more accessible or more affordable. About the Author
Emre SchveighofferEmre Schveighoffer is the founder and president of National Resource Management, Inc. (NRM), a Massachusetts-based manufacturer of intelligent refrigeration controls. He is the author of Cold Truth: How Smart Refrigeration Monitoring Eliminates the Risk You've Been Living With. Coming Next in The Cold Chain Corner
The Check Engine Light Your Refrigeration Never HadThe next article in the series takes a closer look at the equipment-level warning signs that can reveal developing refrigeration problems before traditional temperature alarms ever fire. |